Blog

When deciding to take on a new compliance initiative, one question that often gets asked is whether or not work done for prior assessments can be leveraged to save time or money. For those who have pursued FedRAMP Authorization and now wish to go through IRAP—both frameworks that must be adhered to as a means to do business with two different governments—the good news is that your experience with FedRAMP will provide a solid foundation for IRAP.

In today’s ever-evolving cyber threat landscape, maintaining robust cybersecurity isn’t just a regulatory requirement—it’s a business imperative, and there are multiple avenues organizations can take to do so.

While the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is technically just a set of guidelines, best practices, and standards intended to improve your infrastructure so that organizations can better manage and reduce cybersecurity risk, it’s possible to go through a five-step assessment process to make sure you really are adhering to those standards and provide independent assurance to your customers.

When organizations opt to pursue a new compliance initiative, aside from cost and necessary resources, the first thought is usually regarding what to expect. That’s true for StateRAMP as well, and though many may—correctly—assume that there are some similarities between it and the more popular FedRAMP, there are several very clear deviations by the former from the latter that you know about going in.

The release of FedRAMP’s Revision 5 has raised many questions, including those regarding the addition of a red team exercise requirement for those seeking FedRAMP authorization. As the #1 provider of FedRAMP assessments on the Marketplace who have extensive experience in offensive security, we have insight to offer.

Looking back, December 2023 was a big month for the Department of Defense (DoD). Not only did they release the 32 CFR Part 170 - Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Proposed Rule, but they also published a memorandum titled Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) Moderate Equivalency for Cloud Service Provider’s (CSP) Cloud Service Offerings (CSOs). The latter, in a huge development, clarified requirements for CSOs that are currently (or will be) storing, processing, or transmitting Covered Defense Information (CDI)—more commonly referred to as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)—although there are some nuances that must be understood.

Now that the DoD Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide (SRG) v1r4 has been officially retired, cloud service providers (CSPs) will need to familiarize themselves with the two new documents that have replaced those requirements—the latest DoD CSP SRG v1r1 and DoD Mission Owner (MO) SRG—to maintain compliance with applicable mandates.

Looking back, December 2023 was a big month for the Department of Defense (DoD), as they released the both memorandum titled Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) Moderate Equivalency for Cloud Service Provider’s Cloud Service Offerings, as well as the 32 CFR Part 170 - Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Proposed Rule.