Schellman becomes The First ISO 42001 ANAB Accredited Certification Body!

Contact Us
Services
Services
Crypto and Digital Trust
Crypto and Digital Trust
Schellman Training
Schellman Training
Sustainability Services
Sustainability Services
AI Services
AI Services
About Us
About Us
Leadership Team
Leadership Team
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility
Careers
Careers
Strategic Partnerships
Strategic Partnerships

The Schellman Blog

Stay up to date with the latest compliance news from the Schellman blog.

Blog Feature

SOC Examinations

By: SCOTT ZELKO
June 23rd, 2017

It may come as a bit of a surprise—maybe not—but there are actually two types of SOC reports. Upon examination, the service organization is responsible for specifying whether or not a “Type 1” or “Type 2” will be performed. It’s important to note the specific use of “Type” as a distinguisher--not “SOC 1” or “SOC 2,” as the different specified “types” are options for both the SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. For those of you that are now thinking, “that’s confusing,” I agree 100% with you. In fact, “Type 2” and “SOC 2” are not at all the same thing, and the “type” of each SOC examination presents important differences for service organizations.

Blog Feature

SOC Examinations

By: NICK BRUCE
May 2nd, 2017

Why would a financial services company need a SOC 1?

Blog Feature

Healthcare Assessments | SOC Examinations

By: GARY NELSON
May 1st, 2017

The short answer is...yes. Now for the long answer - a SOC 2 report requires that a service organization has sufficient control activities in place to address the Trust Services Principles and Criteria (TSPC) developed by the AICPA. However, there are no stipulations by the AICPA as to what those control activities have to be. As long as the criteria are satisfactorily addressed to align with the risks that a service organization has identified, a service organization has some flexibility with the controls they implement.

Blog Feature

SOC Examinations | Audit Readiness

By: STEPHEN HALBROOK
December 5th, 2016

Here are five steps to help successfully prepare: 1. Validate the Nature of the Request. Does your client base understand the various SOC reporting options and what they are asking of your organization from a compliance reporting perspective? Is there a connection to internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) of the services that you provide to your clients, or are you looking at general controls of a system that are relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and/or privacy? SOC 1 can oftentimes be misused by the general public as a generic reference to third party examinations. There is misconception in the marketplace; help prevent it.

Blog Feature

Healthcare Assessments | SOC Examinations

By: OLIVIA REFILE
September 27th, 2016

What is the SOC 2? At a high level a SOC 2 examination is a report on internal controls of a service organization related to the Trust Service Principles and Criteria (TSPs), which include: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and/or privacy. Reporting on these TSPs can provide assurance around the adequacy of your services’ security control environment.

Blog Feature

ISO Certifications | SOC Examinations

By: DANNY MANIMBO
September 6th, 2016

NOTE: Schellman has since updated and expanded this information in an article found here.

Blog Feature

SOC Examinations

By: BHARGAV ACHARYA
August 15th, 2016

Cloud computing is an efficient, conducive, and ubiquitous model for on-demand network access to a common pool of configurable computing resources, according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-145. The goal of cloud computing is to achieve rapid provisioning with minimal service provider or management synergy. Cloud service providers typically deliver one of three types of services:

Blog Feature

Healthcare Assessments | SOC Examinations

By: GARY NELSON
August 8th, 2016

One of my favorite quotes from Ghostbusters is the exchange between Ray Stantz and Peter Venkman:

{